-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Iadonisi wrote: > I'd like to suggest for you to rally support from a few people to go > through the recompilations necessary for the entire distribution > (suggest using FC3 as the base) to prove the points you've been making. > There are a few things I think you will need to consider if you want to > be convincing. > First, provide the entire resulting RPMS for download (bittorrent to > share bandwidth) for others to help out with benchmarking. For the > truly paranoid (and to comply with most FOSS licenses), provide the > SRPMS as well. > Next, be sure that anyone who does the 'subjective' part of the test > has two *identical* machines side by side to test simultaneously. If > anyone's going to trust someone saying "It's faster" without hard > numbers, it'll be a hard sell unless there are no time and space > separators involved in the test. Why do you need 2 machines and not just 1 dual booted machine? You can rule out chipset and harware diaparity that way? Maybe i am missing something. - -- Michael Favia michael.favia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Insites Incorporated http://michael.insitesinc.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB8SG9BVsNYjF2rDYRAqr9AJ9mT2PcV3BRVbP5DIhpp28r4a5o9ACghxXw aeo+E8MYzwZo+8W3jSwUub4= =4WmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
