Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 18:45 +0100, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > (...) > Sorry that you disagree, but as someone who has reviewed and approved > several hundreds of packages at fedora.us, it is my opinion that the > classification (at least the split into stable+testing) has been > beneficial. I am agree with stable+testing (or stable+rawhide). But testing for testing propose _only_. Mplayer is in "unstable" since many months in livna. Doesn't seems it's for testing only. Since many people use mplayer, many people have "unstable" in their yum.conf. The situation is not the same with FC/Rawhide and update/update_testing. A very few people use Rawhide or update_testing. > > > Debian have this "feature" I am not convinced it's very useful. > > That's quite a different one. Right.
