tor 2005-01-20 klockan 11:20 +0000 skrev Jonathan Andrews: > On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 08:14, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 22:43 +0000, Jonathan Andrews wrote: > > > Is XDMCP, remote X bust in core 3 ? > > > > I was using it not so long ago and it was working fine. > > > > > I've tried the gui configuration for tool gdm. The machine has no > > > firewall enabled - all I get the "gdm_child_action: Aborting display > > > jonspc:1" in the log ? > > > > I'm suprised that's the only message you get - a glance at the code > > suggests if you're getting this error message (which is from the master) > > you should be getting another message from the slave. > If found my problem, its a name resolver issue (thank you Mr Cox :-D ) > I think email is on a go-slow, please look back if you have time. > > Some comments on this and a few other things > > 1) gdm doesn't have a process itself, it runs from init - but when gdm > is started it seems to undergo a name change to "gdm-binary" without > being owned by gdm or anything called gdm. As a result its not possible > to cleanly restart gdm ? ie no "/etc/init.d/gdm restart". Am I missing > something here or this a bit naff ? You can simply kill gdm by pkill gdm-binary (or your preferred method of killing processes). init should respawn gdm automatically. /Peter
