On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:22:53PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Providing 'kernel-modules' on the other hand... i don't think anything > requires 'kernel-modules' so it might be okay to make kernel-devel > provide that but i still seems to me like potential double-meaning to > what 'kernel-modules' means since kernel-devel doesnt actually include > a single kernel-module. > > Maybe Dave Jones can be poked into making a comment about this. Adding either of the provides seems like a rather ugly hack. up2date already has the smarts to installonly the -devel package, so I'm of the opinion yum should be fixed to do the right thing too. Jeremy is rebuilding yum as I type for tomorrows rawhide to take care of this issue. Dave
