-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:22:53PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > Providing 'kernel-modules' on the other hand... i don't think anything > > requires 'kernel-modules' so it might be okay to make kernel-devel > > provide that but i still seems to me like potential double-meaning to > > what 'kernel-modules' means since kernel-devel doesnt actually include > > a single kernel-module. > > > > Maybe Dave Jones can be poked into making a comment about this. > > Adding either of the provides seems like a rather ugly hack. > up2date already has the smarts to installonly the -devel package, > so I'm of the opinion yum should be fixed to do the right thing too. > Jeremy is rebuilding yum as I type for tomorrows rawhide to > take care of this issue. Yes but the real question is "Where does this information belong?" I dont think that these things should be managed ad-hoc by each competing package manager but instead internalized into the packages themselves somehow for scalabiltiy and adaptability purposes. - -- Michael Favia michael.favia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Insites Incorporated http://michael.insitesinc.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB8ykBBVsNYjF2rDYRAvApAJ0aoYeqEuIFDovCsZgxdoZS7093qgCgjCi0 M/g76/4+8nV+BWkkpdgrqz4= =3K86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
