On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 12:00 -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote: > I believe I saw these on a list for inclusion in FC4. However, there > have been no signs of it yet. > > OO 2 was delayed a bit, so I can see if this was dropped, though I hope > it wasn't. To build the help documentation of OOo2 you require a working java, so I've been working on making OOo and gcj play together well enough to do that, and support a handful of the optional java components. The gcj patches for OOo were approved up-stream on friday. There was a little problem in libgcj which should be resolved soon enough https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=142366 and then we should be able to push a OOo2 alpha/beta in parallel with the OOo1.1 similiar to gcc4/gcc reasonably soon. A sort of relevent pretty picture progress dashboard http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/progress/progress.png C.
