On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:39:55 -0600 (CST), Rex Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > A question to packagers: what would you think of a policy to add the library
> > soname in package libraries ? For example, I have a libkexif package, which
>
> If it *must* be done, you need to follow (appoximately at least)
> Mandrake's style, and build
> libkexif0
> libkexif1
> ... etc
>
> With each (ideally) including
> Provides: libkexif = %{version}
>
> Also, doing it this way, You can't ever have a *real* libkexif rpm pkg
> anymore due to a recent rpm bug... err... feature:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/130352
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/111071
Add this one to the list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/145091#c6
