Re: suggests/requires in rpm - missingOK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:

Should the missingOK flag just make you able to *install* a package
without the package which "may be missing", but not upgrade - say if you
have a libary that needs to be upgraded in paralell to an app, and you
upgraded the app but not the lib (because of slow packager etc) - then
some functionality would suddenly just wanish...



Nah, convoluting install vs upgrade mode behavior changes into "missingok" would
make everyone's head hurt. Certainly gives me a headache ;-)


Nice and KISSy, "missingok" is a "optional" edge in a dependency graph until the
depsolver guys catch up ...


73 de Jeff




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux