Re: further package removals/potential package removals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:37:04 +0100, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMO, if you want to remove joe from Core, you should be consequent and
> remove vi, emacs, xemacs, etc. too and let only ship one single, small
> and statically linked ascii text-editor remain in Core, may-be nano.
> Otherwise I would recommend to remove nano, because I don't see any
> reason why it should be integrated into Core.

There is value in having one ascii editor in Core when doing system
troubleshooting.  Bugs still happen.. misconfigurations still
happen(more than bugs) and when you are trying to walk someone through
troubleshooting or workarounds in a mailinglist, forum, or irc... it
can be much simplier to have them use an ascii editor to make
corrections to system configuration text files and sometimes necessary
if there is a misconfiguration that prevents X from starting.

-jef


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux