Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Petrus de Calguarium
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Petrus de Calguarium
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Colin Walters
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Colin Walters
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Petrus de Calguarium
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Rex Dieter
FESCo meeting summary for 20091023
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Petrus de Calguarium
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: Action Tags concept
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Gerry Reno
orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Neal Becker
Action Tags concept for Fedora PkgDB
From
: Martin Bacovsky
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Terry Barnaby
rawhide report: 20091023 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Steven Whitehouse
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Pete Zaitcev
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Mike McGrath
RE: pxe-kexec
From
: Scott_Collier
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Adam Miller
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Jesse Keating
Plan for tomorrow's (20091023) FESCo meeting
From
: Jon Stanley
pxe-kexec
From
: Ed Swierk
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora Test Day Summary - Confined Users
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Pete Zaitcev
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: David Stark
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Pete Zaitcev
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: extracting multiple sources in %setup
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: José Matos
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Jiri Cerny
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: rawhide report: 20091022 changes
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Quentin Armitage
Re: rawhide report: 20091022 changes
From
: Quentin Armitage
Re: Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: Jon Masters
Fedora with Universal Binaries?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Unreadable binaries
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jon Masters
Re: Status of multiseat feature
From
: Matthias Clasen
The future of "rawhide" (was [Fwd: Re: "What is the Fedora Project?"])
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Jesse Keating
Status of multiseat feature
From
: Linus Walleij
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Mike McGrath
Fedora Test Day Summary - Confined Users
From
: Eduard Benes
F-12 Beta Blocker Meeting 2009-10-21 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT) - Recap
From
: James Laska
Re: Unreadable binaries
From
: Stephen Smalley
Re: Unreadable binaries
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: problem with dns
From
: Michał Piotrowski
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Upload debug-like-info to Mozilla servers every update
From
: Jan Horak
Re: F12 media-less installer totally broken
From
: Chris Lumens
Orphan Package: system-config-cluster (was Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2)
From
: Steven Whitehouse
rawhide report: 20091022 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: extracting multiple sources in %setup
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Fedora 12 Blocker Bug Meeting #1 :: 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: James Laska
Should installkernel be passing --dracut to new-kernel-pkg?
From
: Stephen Smalley
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Michal Schmidt
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Liang Suilong
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Liang Suilong
Re: dracut, or should booting a LiveCD touch the hard disk?
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: dracut, or should booting a LiveCD touch the hard disk?
From
: Hans de Goede
Major reorganization of TeX Live packages
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: What does it mean "<package> not tagged as an update candidate"?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Unreadable binaries
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Till Maas
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Unable to download Fedora 12 beta using jigdo
From
: Hedayat Vatankhah
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
What does it mean "<package> not tagged as an update candidate"?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: extracting multiple sources in %setup
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: extracting multiple sources in %setup
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Fedora 12 Blocker Bug Meeting #1 :: 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: Richard Hughes
extracting multiple sources in %setup
From
: Marcus Moeller
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Michal Hlavinka
Fwd: Power Managemet Testday 22. Oct 2009
From
: Marcela Mašláňová
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Liang Suilong
Unable to download Fedora 12 beta using jigdo
From
: Hedayat Vatankhah
Re: problem with dns
From
: Giovanni Tirloni
problem with dns
From
: Michał Piotrowski
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Michał Piotrowski
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Michał Piotrowski
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Fedora 12 Blocker Bug Meeting #1 :: 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: Adam Williamson
Fedora 12 Blocker Bug Meeting #1 :: 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: John Poelstra
F12 media-less installer totally broken
From
: Ahmed Kamal
Re: new tool: rpmguard - print important differences between RPMs
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: nodata
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: On updates to stable releases
From
: Seth Vidal
On updates to stable releases
From
: Adam Jackson
Notice: Fedora 12 Tagging Status Update
From
: Warren Togami
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Thomas Janssen
Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Charley Wang
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Fix possibility of infinite loop in init scripts in time for Fedora 12?
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: new tool: rpmguard - print important differences between RPMs
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Michal Schmidt
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Steven Whitehouse
Re: Tag the F-12 updates?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Steven Whitehouse
Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: new tool: rpmguard - print important differences between RPMs
From
: Alexey Torkhov
rawhide report: 20091021 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
new tool: rpmguard - print important differences between RPMs
From
: Kamil Paral
Fedora 12 Beta
From
: Michał Piotrowski
Re: F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster
From
: Steven Whitehouse
Re: Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Fwd: Request to update ATi OSS driver for Fedora 12
From
: Liang Suilong
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Fix possibility of infinite loop in init scripts in time for Fedora 12?
From
: hidenori.ishii
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: rpmnew files
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: Tag the F-12 updates?
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Eric Springer
Re: Tag the F-12 updates?
From
: Warren Togami
Re: F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Jesse Keating
[Test-Announce] F-12 Beta Blocker Meeting 2009-10-21 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: James Laska
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
F12 Security Updates not tagged (Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Till Maas
Re: rpmnew files
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: nodata
Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12
From
: Bruno Wolff III
rpmnew files
From
: nodata
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Till Maas
Re: [Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: Till Maas
Reminder: Tagging Policy for Fedora 12
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: nodata
Re: Passing on ownership for a package...
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Passing on ownership for a package...
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Problem building Asterisk sounds
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Adam Williamson
SciTech SIG members: EMBOSS is now packaged, comaintainership welcome, java skills helpful
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: nodata
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Upcoming Schedule
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Problem building Asterisk sounds
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Orion Poplawski
KDE-SIG weekly report (43/2009)
From
: Sebastian Vahl
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Theodore Papadopoulo
Re: koji noarch build errors
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Passing on ownership for a package...
From
: Jon Ciesla
Passing on ownership for a package...
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Eric Sandeen
Fedora 12 Beta now available!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Broken dependencies - thunderbird-3.0-2.8.b4.fc11
From
: TK009
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
rawhide report: 20091020 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Broken dependencies - thunderbird-3.0-2.8.b4.fc11
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Panu Matilainen
F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: koji noarch build errors
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Tomas Mraz
Eternal 'good file hashes' list
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: nodata
Package Review Stats for last 7 days ending 18th Oct
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: [Test-Announce] 2009-10-20 Confined Users Test Day
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Re: [Test-Announce] 2009-10-20 Confined Users Test Day
From
: James Laska
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: David
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: drago01
the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: mcloaked
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: mcloaked
Re: [Test-Announce] 2009-10-20 Confined Users Test Day
From
: James Laska
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: David
Re: buildinstall on Fedora 11
From
: Jesse Keating
buildinstall on Fedora 11
From
: Marcus Moeller
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Julian Sikorski
Fwd: [Test-Announce] 2009-10-20 Confined Users Test Day
From
: Eduard Benes
Re: Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: How can I get a response on a specific bz report concerning sane-backends?
From
: Mike Cloaked
koji noarch build errors
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Matěj Cepl
rawhide report: 20091019 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Ismael Olea
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Yaakov Nemoy
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Matěj Cepl
How can I get a response on a specific bz report concerning sane-backends?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
Re: [Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
RPM Database issue
From
: Ganotis, Ioannis
Re: [Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: sankarshan
Re: [Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: yersinia
Re: [Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
[Fwd: Junior Jobs]
From
: Miroslav Suchý
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: James Antill
Packaging files that rpmbuild's auto-{requires,provides} trips on
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Eric Springer
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Ismael Olea
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Eric Springer
Thunderbird 3.0rc1
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Mike Cloaked
rawhide report: 20091018 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: drago01
Re: Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Status of touchpad support in F12 for kdm?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: TK009
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
USB Keyboard Amok?
From
: Petrus de Calguarium
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: TK009
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
rawhide report: 20091017 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Till Maas
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Dr. Diesel
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Till Maas
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Adam Williamson
Retiring package: ocaml-camlimages
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rawhide report: 20091016 changes
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
rawhide report: 20091016 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
removing icqnd from licq package
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Till Maas
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Till Maas
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Status of geronimo
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: Status of geronimo
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
From
: Steven James Drinnan
Plan for tomorrow's (20091016) FESCo meeting
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Status of geronimo
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Network not starting during install
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Network not starting during install
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Network not starting during install
From
: Mike Chambers
Fwd: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Network not starting during install
From
: Jesse Keating
Network not starting during install
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: chasd
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Maintainer MIA: Claudio Tomasoni
From
: Kevin Kofler
Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: chasd
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Mark McLoughlin
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
What to do if a deprecated license is used? nescc java files with intel license
From
: Till Maas
rawhide report: 20091015 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Status of geronimo
From
: Alexander Kurtakov
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Maintainer MIA: Claudio Tomasoni
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Mark McLoughlin
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Conrad Meyer
tagging of non critical path package into F-12?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: John Poelstra
bodhi changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Luke Macken
Status of geronimo
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Luke Macken
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Adam Williamson
Rationale behind _cmake_skip_rpath choice in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake
From
: Theodore Papadopoulo
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: chasd
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Jud Craft
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Felix Kaechele
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Alex Hudson
Re: Updates-testing
From
: Alex Hudson
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird rel-eng
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Seth Vidal
Updates-testing (was: Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?)
From
: Alex Hudson
Re: mingw32 suite
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
thunderbird rel-eng
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Mike Cloaked
Re: Upload debug-like-info to Mozilla servers every update
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Itamar Reis Peixoto
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Felix Kaechele
Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Upload debug-like-info to Mozilla servers every update
From
: Jan Horak
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: thunderbird upgrade - wtf?
From
: Steve Dickson
Re: mingw32 suite
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
rawhide report: 20091014 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: mingw32 suite
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: How about releasing an update of xorg-x11-drv-intel for Fedora 11
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: mingw32 suite
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
