On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 20:26 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 14.10.2009 22:26, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > I agree with this, but by the same token, the use suggested by Matej > > seems against the purpose of updates-testing, as does the original idea > > in this thread (push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting > > in stable into it). I also agree with Kevin - maybe we don't need to > > *disallow* updates sitting in -testing for a long time, but updates > > sitting there for a long time is an indication of potential issues and > > it should be flagged for tracking. > > OK, thanks for clearing my internal conflict for me -- now there would > be no n-2 new packages from me. Simple, easy. (BTW, I always have karma > switched on, but usually nobody bothers to push karma up, so none of my > packages got pushed to stable based on its karma). I should've clarified that as far as new packages go, I don't see a problem with just pushing them to stable after a few days in -testing as long as no-one complains. It's quite hard for a new package to *break* something on a currently-working system without explicit action from the user, which is the worst thing an update can do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
