On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 11:21 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:58:45 +0200, Kevin wrote: > > > We really need some stricter enforcement against stuff sitting in testing > > forever. > > Rather we need some rules against such mindset. > > We don't guarantee anything about updates-testing. It's a place where > to test potential updates/upgrades. And if a test-update is still without > sufficient karma points (either positive or negative) for several weeks, > it may stay in updates-testing for a longer time. IMO, that's a good > thing. I agree with this, but by the same token, the use suggested by Matej seems against the purpose of updates-testing, as does the original idea in this thread (push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting in stable into it). I also agree with Kevin - maybe we don't need to *disallow* updates sitting in -testing for a long time, but updates sitting there for a long time is an indication of potential issues and it should be flagged for tracking. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
