Dne 14.10.2009 22:26, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > I agree with this, but by the same token, the use suggested by Matej > seems against the purpose of updates-testing, as does the original idea > in this thread (push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting > in stable into it). I also agree with Kevin - maybe we don't need to > *disallow* updates sitting in -testing for a long time, but updates > sitting there for a long time is an indication of potential issues and > it should be flagged for tracking. OK, thanks for clearing my internal conflict for me -- now there would be no n-2 new packages from me. Simple, easy. (BTW, I always have karma switched on, but usually nobody bothers to push karma up, so none of my packages got pushed to stable based on its karma). Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC The state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else. -- Frederick Bastiat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
