On Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 00:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Why not just require a secondary email address? > > "Require" a secondary email address? Not everyone has one, or wants > to hand it over if they do. That sounds more like a recipe for driving > maintainers away than making sure you can contact them. How about: Maintainers should provide a secondary e-mail address if their primary address is supplied by their current employer. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
