Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Why not just require a secondary email address?

"Require" a secondary email address?  Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do.  That sounds more like a recipe for driving
maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux