On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > > What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their > > > > packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new > > > > private account before leaving Red Hat. > > > > > > That assumes the maintainer knows they're leaving Red Hat ahead of time. > > > > Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora > > work :-/ > > > > We generally discourage it but several still do it. Err surely just the opposite. At least anyone who works on both RHEL and Fedora will use their @redhat.com address because they need this to be able to see private BZ comments & most people don't want to constantly be switching between 2 BZ account logins just to use alternate addr for Fedora. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
