Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Le Jeu 22 octobre 2009 23:45, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> > Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
>> > work :-/
>>
>> We generally discourage it but several still do it.
>
> Uh, we do? No-one's ever indicated that to me. Why would it be
> discouraged? Doesn't RH like its contributions to Fedora to be clear?

The right solution is just to have some manager as fallback address. Telling
people to use a non-rh address when their Fedora activity is linked to their
@rh work is ridiculous.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux