Wow this has really hit sore point, It just goes to show that there pro and cons on both sides. Like or not people want the ability to filter content that that deem unfit. Thats why I asked about it in the first place the concern was simple, I have young children and I installed a screamingly innocent package. That had foul language. Some of may not be too concerned but it does put Fedora's rep in question. A user/parent/employer should be able to restrict what content is allowed or not allowed. And what is the best way to accomplish this. Well any ideas, for me Package Kit would be the way to go. Then users could add the packages or groups to the exclude list. Maybe an extra password (optional) for parents / supervisors. Or like was mentioned a way to create a YUM exclude list. Stop this bickering lets try and solve an issue. Steven On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 11:47 +1000, Eric Springer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ismael Olea <ismael@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My 0.02€ > > More like your troll-cents. Despite the absurdity (of this whole > thing, in fact) I've added a category and included it. And people can > make up their own minds. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
