On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12 > >> Moblin remix spin > > > > You can add custom repositories to spin config files, so you could get > > the updated packages in that way. Not ideal, but it ought to work. > > Already done so, farking painful and the other people that are > actually using it have borked builds because there was no email about > the changes to NetworkManager to fedora-devel to allow me to get a > rebuild done in time. It obviously a "I'm right Jack" situation. Dan, in future can you let Peter know when you make changes to NetworkManager which require clients to be rebuilt? > > As Conrad said, there's no concerted policy here AFAIK, just that no-one > > yet reached your ticket for some reason. > > Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed > communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be > that it would be complete lock down for core stuff with more > flexibility for the stuff that obviously isn't mainline and going > affect the core stability but then then I've not seen communication > either way so I honestly would have no idea. I should have said that no-one reached your ticket before the solid-freeze for the Beta release, I'm not disagreeing with Jesse. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
