On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 20:47 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > What > happened is that some IMAP-related feature broke, affecting some users (and > I'm sorry you were hit by it), whereas most had their IMAP working just > fine. So those bugs weren't trivial to catch. Wow ... it's almost as if we need a place where developers could put _updates_ for a significant amount of time so that users could do some _testing_ on them, under each of their particular conditions. We could maybe use this instead of developers hitting the go button when they didn't get an avalanche of BZs immediately. It'd also be cool if we could have some package management tool to "downgrade" these updates, so users wouldn't be immediate screwed if they tried an update for testing purposes ... it might even be possible to create a history of package management operations, and then the user could just "undo" the set of things they got from this place for testing of updates. I must meditate on this. -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via packages." -- Les Mikesell -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
