On 10/16/2009 05:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Yes, I know, that's opinion of people around KDE that they don't >> distinguish between Rawhide and updates-testing > > That's not true. In KDE SIG: > * we do not push KDE prereleases to updates-testing (nor to the stable > updates, of course), > * we rarely push application prereleases to updates-testing (and when we do, > it's with the intention of promoting them to stable, or the final release > (or a later prerelease) which is just days (not months) away), > * we do not push updates which make major changes (e.g. feature regressions) > to applications, neither to testing nor stable. Well, I do remember spending hours switching from kmail to thunderbird in the past because a KDE update in Fedora broke IMAP support and it stayed broken for quite sometime. Also many of the KDE apps after a rewrite tend to be quite close to alpha/beta releases for a while rather than general releases, Amarok being a good example. It is sometimes pretty tricky to judge. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
