On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:51:01AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > Not likely. dahdi-linux support is pretty spotty. atrpms can go a long time > > > without having a version for a specific version Fedora. For example there > > > is no rawhide version now and there was a long period without one for > > > F11. I uploaded some F12 builds. > > about a month or so before the targeted release date (which means > > about now). I don't think that F11 was w/o dahdi-linux kmdls for any > > long period. > > Possibly it was during the F11 rawhide period that I looked and I didn't > check back for a while after the release. > > Unfortunately my tdm card is in my only machine at home that has 3d graphics at > all working using the drivers in Fedora. And I needed to go to rawhide to > get that working more than I needed to having tdm card working (though in > the end I got both). Give the current packages a try, if there are issues we'll get them fixed. > > `recursion' warnings due to rpm's limitation of macros depth (which > > has nothing to do with recursion), which is at 16, but in reality > > means about 3-4 nested macros. > > Yes. But I didn't see any clear instructions for how to work around it. > It seems that for some people using --define can work around the problem > if you know what to define. There was also a comment that you don't see > the problem because of something in your environment but I didn't see > any directions on how to set up a similar environment. I use --define kmdl_kernelsrcdir /.../, that's all. But the error is still just cosmetic, if I encounter it in a manual build, the build still succeeds. > > > > What I had to do for F12 is grab a spec file (that get's updates at > > > the source) that was proposed for rpmfusion (but never got adopted > > > by them) and then use an svn version of dahdi that has a fix for a > > > change in the way the kernel is being built (some compatibility > > > feature that got dropped in 2.6.32). That box has been extra > > > unstable lately, though I don't know if that is do to 3D graphics or > > > dahdi-linux. > > > > Have you tried the common src.rpm at ATrpms? Maybe you should check > > out ATrpms in a couple of days and see whether there is dahdi support > > for F12 there. > > I tried using the dahdi-linux src rpm while having atrpms-rpm-config > installed, but hit the recursion problem and got stuck there. I would > still have had the problem with the last released dahdi not working > with 2.6.31 kernels. But fixing that would have taken the same route > as with the path I ended up taking. > -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpkoKUTOIf8B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
