On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 18:31:03 +0200, > Why should we make peoples' lives harder getting the tools they > need? Example: Somebody without the DAHDI Kernel Modules would > probably not try to use the DAHDI Tools since he probably won't even > know what it's good for. However It makes things easier for the > people who do know what DAHDI is to have tools to use their DAHDI > hardware (they compiled/got the Kernel modules for) just a yum > install away. Not likely. dahdi-linux support is pretty spotty. atrpms can go a long time without having a version for a specific version Fedora. For example there is no rawhide version now and there was a long period without one for F11. There are issues trying to rebuild atrpms src rpms on fedora. Just grabbing atrms-rpm-config doesn't help with recursion issues that Alex doesn't see because of his custom environment. What I had to do for F12 is grab a spec file (that get's updates at the source) that was proposed for rpmfusion (but never got adopted by them) and then use an svn version of dahdi that has a fix for a change in the way the kernel is being built (some compatibility feature that got dropped in 2.6.32). That box has been extra unstable lately, though I don't know if that is do to 3D graphics or dahdi-linux. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
