-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 22.10.2009 19:38, schrieb Jon Masters: > Except, they're not really ELF binaries. ELF doesn't allow you to do > both at the same time in the headers, so this adds a new header and is > essentially an encapsulation for other ELF files. Thus, a kernel patch > is required and it would be some time before all kernels supported it. > I'm not against the notion of this...but I think some of the usual > suspects need to get involved in standardizing such an ELF hack. > > (You might be able to do something with binfmt_misc as a hack) > > Jon. > Creating FatELF binaries doesn't solve any x86_64 related issues. For example: Old releases of blender was not able to creates proper .blend files when the binary was compiled for x86_64. In this case the created files was not usable on the x86_32 release. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAkrgmcEACgkQZLAIBz9lVu++FgP/br8KeMY5vp8V88xv4hoH9pyV 2vuJJyhszaWl/qFN9Iax7Q5p1A3muC/BFHhUu6VWphB2xIj9EXkMhubgVtX7OBBc J+v/wv0bWU2kBVFsYDUcfoiTkxluI4uuttTRoqZm7TUuc9/EMBVwzWGeqsBYoFej xV9jjWk4dGJ/sFlFC3I= =uZBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
