Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer <cemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
>> > into dist-f12 provide over having them as updates? (Pushing updates is the
>> > suggested approach unless there's some reason it won't work in your case.)
>>
>> Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
>> Moblin remix spin and allows others to test them rather than me having
>> to setup a separate repository so I can test how the interact with the
>> rest of the Moblin packages in Fedora.
>>
> Does the old network-manager-netbook prevent people from getting onto the
> network?  If so, it seems important to make sure the fixed version goes into
> the release repositories.

Yes, in fact it doesn't even run. That's why it seems that all the
various NM vpn plugins had to be recompiled as well.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux