Re: Unresponsive maintainer for system-config-cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,

Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
maintainer procedure, but I was hoping to be able to skip the section
regarding sending of messages since there seems little point sending to
an email address which I know (and which other Red Hat employees can
easily verify) will not be answered.

+1 from here...I already e-mailed Jim Parson a long long time (for sure more than a year) ago because of some trivial outstanding bugs in that package (missing requires, incorrect pam configuration, ...), some of them I fixed then, some are still left. I tried several times and didn't get any response.


I would like to either fix (or preferably just remove) this package as
it creates configs for GFS2 which are incorrect and is thus causing
confusion to all who attempt to use it.

Hm...I would appreciate keeping the package (...and could fix the very trivial of the remaining bugreports), how complicated would it be to fix the GFS2 configs? On the other hand, I've heard from somebody of the RH cluster team that the package is deprecated at all, how's that?

Regards,
Milos

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux