On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 14:18:23 -0700, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Two, it makes testing things a bit more complex. Those of us who like to > test upcoming stuff in real use - i.e. on our main machines - will have > to choose whether to test "rawhide", in which case we'll have more pain > to deal with ourselves and won't be contributing as much to testing of > the next stable release, or test the next stable release, in which case > we aren't helping maintainers by making sure the stuff they're putting > in "rawhide" isn't totally broken. The impression I got (which might be wrong), is that it was expected that people would test specific packages from rawhide and not be expected to be running it all at once. Porbably the best equvialent to current rawhide would be enabling updates-testing for the pending release. People that needed some that wouldn't break unexpectedly, but still wanted to try out the new stuff could run the pending release without updates-testing. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
