On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt > >>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade > >>> experience and issues for F-12. > >>> > >>> Probably the two usual things that people query are grahics and wifi. > >>> The model I have has the Intel IWL-4965AGN device which as expected > >>> works fine. > >>> > >>> I'm having a few issues with the nouveau driver with plymouth in that > >>> it doesn't work at all but if I remove all the options from the kernel > >>> boot line it gets to X and apart from some initial corruption as GDM > >>> comes up its OK from there. I have no idea how to debug this. > >> > >> Try adding the parameter 'nomodeset' instead of removing any parameters. > >> What happens then? > > > > It has certainly improved it. I wasn't in front of the machine as it > > booted this morning so I'll need to check out plymouth this evening > > but the responsiveness of the display is improved and I don't get > > duplicate mouse pointers now. The performance seems reduced compared > > to F-11 though :-( > > > >>> Probably the most annoying is the breakage of sound. This seems to > >>> have every other kernel/alsa/pulseaudio update and was an issue on and > >>> off right through F-11 as well so its not exactly surprising but also > >>> disappointing that one of the most common devices running Fedora has > >>> sound broken on a semi regular basis. Again some pointers in debugging > >>> this so it can be fixed by F-12 final would be great. > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bug_info_kernel_sound > >> > >>> The only other very minor issue I see is that the icon spacing on the > >>> gnome panels is massive! > >> > >> This is currently being 'enthusiastically' discussed on > >> fedora-desktop-list. :) > > > > Thanks for the pointer. I noticed its also been tweaked in todays rawhide. > > > > I've also noticed of late that yum performance has gone through the floor too. > > I never finished that. Its currently necking one core of a 2.5 ghz > penryn and using nearly a gig of RAM. It literally now takes hours to > update my Fit-PC (500mhz geode with 256Mb RAM). Geode GX2/500 has basically zero cache (either L1 or L2), and 256MB is really the bare minimum for the install/upgrade process. You'll be swapping to disk a lot during the upgrade while the depsolving goes on, and yeah, it'll take quite a while. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
