On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Alex Hudson wrote: > On 14/10/09 15:31, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 09:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > > The problem isn't GLODA and smart folders, it's that we have no process in > > > place to identify and deal with problems like this before it's too late. > > > > > Aside from updates-testing you mean, where people can test potential > > updates and give feedback as to how they work on their systems? > > > > For me, there is a bit of a problem with updates-testing: the machine I work > on is my primary desktop, and I'm extremely wary of getting myself into a > situation I can't easily get out of. Now, you might argue that avoiding u-t is > essentially avoiding the inevitable (and Tbird 3 has shown me that, so I > agree), but it is riskier. > > What would sell me totally on u-t was if there was something where I can roll > back bad packages. > I've suggested this very thing in a F-A-B thread this week. We, packagers, have no way to fix a mistake and very few things preventing us from making them: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-October/msg00168.html -Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
