On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Martin Bacovsky wrote: > On Thursday 22 October 2009 16:33:06 you wrote: > > > > I like this concept. How does it relate to tagging? > > * As a replacement for tagging > > * As a separate feature from tagging > > * In addition to tagging where some output utilizes both tags and actions > I was thinking of replacing current tags, because I'm affraid users will be confused by two kinds of > tags. On the other hand I would keep categories imported from .desktop files (readonly/searchonly). > So I think we might be committed to having freeform tags for its use as a comps replacement and grouping mechanism. I'm not 100% sure though. There is overlap:: python-openssl tags: python, module, ssl, encryption, hashing, binding, MIT Tasks: Use this to write programs in python that can communicate with network services over SSL Use this to write python programs that encrypt, decrypt, and hash data. Actions: python programming, network programming, encryption programming?, decryption programming? hash programming? So there's some things that aren't captured (for instance that this is licensed MIT (which may not be an issue, we can grab that from the license tag) and that this is a binding (which I don't see how to capture in an action). There's also some things that I wonder about a bit -- hash programming and encryption progamming are awkward phrases -- makes me wonder if that's trying to shoehorn a concept into the wrong tool. How will user's know to find the action encryption programming, hash programming, python programming? How will we compose the actions into tasks? Also, how do we get the users to only enter actions(verbs) and not nouns when supplying new actions for a package? -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpGQGsxci3jU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
