Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/10/14 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> This is an interesting question. Suppose someone wrote (for example) an
> GPLed configuration tool for a closed-source hardware driver. Would it
> be permissible to include an open-source tool in the distribution, even
> knowing it would only ever be usable with a tainted kernel?

An example from a real life is a proprietary drivers, which sometimes
has only kernel-part closed, while has opensourced userspace.


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux