Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: Can rpmfind.net be removed from the mirrors list ?
From
: ne...
Re: rawhide report: 20040612 changes
From
: Ivan Gyurdiev
rawhide report: 20040612 changes
From
: Build System
init patch
From
: Russell Coker
Re: Automake in FC2
From
: Ville Skyttä
Automake in FC2
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Can rpmfind.net be removed from the mirrors list ?
From
: Yusuf Goolamabbas
Re: Grub + DualBoot + ChainLoader
From
: Andrew Farris
packaging installed documentation
From
: Shahms King
how to override kernel modules?
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: subversion-0.32.1-5
From
: Joe Orton
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: subversion-1.0.4-2
From
: Joe Orton
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Alexander Dalloz
Re: update etiquette
From
: Ville Skyttä
Fedora News Updates #13
From
: Colin Charles
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: cvs-1.11.17-2
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: cvs-1.11.17-1
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Kenneth Porter
Re: update etiquette
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: Dovecot and mailbox eating
From
: Florian La Roche
Dovecot and mailbox eating
From
: Alan Cox
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: kernel-2.6.6-1.427
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: update etiquette
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Matthew Miller
update etiquette
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: samba 3.0.3-5 bug...?
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: samba 3.0.3-5 bug...?
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: samba-3.0.4-1.FC1 update printing bug
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Neal Becker
rawhide report: 20040611 changes
From
: Build System
samba-3.0.4-1.FC1 update printing bug
From
: Aurelien Bompard
samba 3.0.3-5 bug...?
From
: MG
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Alan
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Alan
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Miloslav Trmac
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Florin Andrei
Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Warren Togami
Fedora Core 2 Update: gaim-0.78-1.FC2
From
: Warren Togami
Fedora Core 1 Update: gaim-0.78-1.FC1
From
: Warren Togami
proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages
From
: Florin Andrei
Fedora Core 1 Update: samba-3.0.4-1.FC1
From
: Jay Fenlason
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Ivan Gyurdiev
Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Jeff Spaleta
OpenSSH - configuring x11 forwarding (was Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes)
From
: John Ellson
Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Dan Williams
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Chip Turner
Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: syslog snafu
From
: Richard Hally
Re: syslog snafu
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
syslog snafu
From
: Richard Hally
Re: xorg and IBM Thinkpad T30
From
: Warren Togami
xorg and IBM Thinkpad T30
From
: Hetz Ben Hamo
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Alan
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Warren Togami
Re: X not starting with intel 845 graphics
From
: Alan
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Alan
Self-Introduction: Alan Olsen
From
: Alan
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Warren Togami
Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Warren Togami
CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Ivan Gyurdiev
Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Havoc Pennington
Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement
From
: Ivan Gyurdiev
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Barry K. Nathan
Re: X not starting with intel 845 graphics
From
: j . mwebb
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Steven Pritchard
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: squid-2.5.STABLE5-4.fc2
From
: Jay Fenlason
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: squid-2.5.STABLE3-2.fc1
From
: Jay Fenlason
Fedora Core 1 Update: vim-6.2.532-1
From
: Karsten Hopp
Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Chris Adams
X not starting with intel 845 graphics
From
: Mountz, Charles
Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes]
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core -- New tag, instead of modifying Core
From
: Bryan J. Smith
rawhide report: 20040609 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Jos Vos
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Mihai Maties
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Alan Cox
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: squirrelmail-1.4.3-1
From
: Gary Benson
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: squirrelmail-1.4.3-0.f1.1
From
: Gary Benson
Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Jos Vos
Static routes. a default static-routes file.
From
: Naoki
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: eric tanguy
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Multiple LUN support?
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Tom Diehl
Bad WindowMaker patch in use; correction attached
From
: Alexey Spiridonov
Re: rebuilding kernel
From
: ne...
Re: rebuilding kernel
From
: ne...
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Willem Riede
Multiple LUN support?
From
: Hugh Caley
Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Alan Cox
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- AMD5x86 = 486 ISA
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Willem Riede
Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Re: v4l2 driver parameters
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: rebuilding kernel
From
: Mark Lane
rebuilding kernel
From
: Otto Haliburton
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: eric tanguy
v4l2 driver parameters
From
: eric tanguy
Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
Re: S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: Dropping python-optik?
From
: Mihai Ibanescu
Re: Dropping python-optik?
From
: Elliot Lee
Re: Dropping python-optik?
From
: Stephen Smoogen
OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Dropping python-optik?
From
: Mihai Ibanescu
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- embedded developers use what they know ...
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- AMD5x86 = 486 ISA
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Alan Cox
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Aurelien Bompard
rawhide report: 20040608 changes
From
: Build System
Re: S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Philip Balister
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: Mihai Maties
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: eric tanguy
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: David L Norris
Re: S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Arjan van de Ven
RE: QA Application XML save formats.
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: fc2, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- embedded developers use what they know ...
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Willem Riede
Fedora Core 2 Update: bison-1.875c-1
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Tom Diehl
RE: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE
From
: Otto Haliburton
Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE
From
: Richard Emberson
rawhide report: 20040607 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Fedora Documentation
From
: alan
S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem
From
: Philip Balister
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: David Kewley
SUMMARY: 3 similar, but distinct, discussions on "Core" changes ...
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: David Kewley
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: kbn
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: Fedora Documentation
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Fedora Documentation
From
: Tim Daly
Re: Fedora Documentation
From
: Gérard Milmeister
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Jeremy Katz
Fedora Documentation
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: kernel-module rpms under FC2
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: djh
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: BogoMips strange behaviour
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc andkernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Remco Treffkorn
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc andkernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Chris Chabot
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Steven Pritchard
Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: mlauterbach
Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
irda problems [FC2]
From
: k b
BogoMips strange behaviour
From
: StoneBeat
Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Willem Riede
Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Willem Riede
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Phillip Compton
Re: Intel® 536ep V.92 modem (PCI) chipset driver & 2.6 kernel under FC2
From
: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
From
: Tom Diehl
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: eric tanguy
Re: USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
USB CD/DVD Burner
From
: eric tanguy
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: William M. Quarles
Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Razvan Corneliu C.R. "d3vi1" VILT
Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Chris Chabot
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Alan Cox
Re: kernel module packages
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Grub + DualBoot + ChainLoader
From
: Chris Chabot
rawhide report: 20040606 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Per Bjornsson
Grub + DualBoot + ChainLoader
From
: Morteza A. Nia
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: William M. Quarles
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: William M. Quarles
Re: Creating RPMs
From
: Michael Schwendt
Up2date url's with user:password@host format
From
: Jos Vos
Re: Creating RPMs
From
: Crutcher Dunnavant
Creating RPMs
From
: William M. Quarles
APT repository problems with up2date
From
: Jos Vos
Re: rawhide report: 20040604 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: kernel module packages
From
: Willem Riede
Re: kernel module packages
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Miloslav Trmac
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Windows Applet wnck-applet
From
: Mark McLoughlin
rawhide report: 20040605 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Windows Applet wnck-applet
From
: _v00d00101_
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Gilles J. Seguin
Re: Linux: x86 No Execute Support
From
: Kenneth Porter
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: David Kewley
Re: kernel-module rpms under FC2
From
: Andrew Farris
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Michael Schwendt
RE: Package List
From
: Childers, Matthew
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Package List
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Shahms King
Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Bill Nottingham
Package List
From
: Childers, Matthew
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Chris Chabot
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: krb5-1.3.3-7
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: krb5-1.3.3-6
From
: Nalin Dahyabhai
Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Lars E. Pettersson
Re: RPM filesystem?
From
: Florin Andrei
Inflation of explicit build requirements
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: David Kewley
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
kernel module packages
From
: Thomas Vander Stichele
Re: mkinitrd failed problems yuming the kernel 2.6.6-1.421
From
: Brian Millett
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Alan Cox
Re: mkinitrd failed problems yuming the kernel 2.6.6-1.421
From
: Arjan van de Ven
mkinitrd failed problems yuming the kernel 2.6.6-1.421
From
: Brian Millett
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Noa Resare
Re: rawhide report: 20040604 changes
From
: John Ellson
Re: rawhide report: 20040604 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: John Ellson
Re: rawhide report: 20040604 changes
From
: Brian Millett
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: John Ellson
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: John Ellson
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: John Ellson
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Tom Diehl
rawhide report: 20040604 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: Rawhide upgrades
From
: Ajay Ramaswamy
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Re: Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Rawhide upgrades
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Phil Knirsch
Re: RPM filesystem?
From
: Mike Hearn
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Dario Lesca
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Dario Lesca
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Markus Lidel
Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver
From
: Dario Lesca
Re: Prepackaged configurations
From
: Rafael Garcia Leiva
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Marius Andreiana
Fedora Core 1 Update: strace-4.5.4-0.FC1
From
: Roland McGrath
Fedora Core 2 Update: strace-4.5.4-1
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: What happened to gtkmm2 ?
From
: Michael Schwendt
IGMPv3 support in glibc
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Re: What happened to gtkmm2 ?
From
: Julian Missig
Re: Rawhide upgrades
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Re: What happened to gtkmm2 ?
From
: Per Bjornsson
What happened to gtkmm2 ?
From
: Denis Leroy
Rawhide upgrades
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE
From
: dhollis
RE: QA Application XML save formats.
From
: Erik LaBianca
Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: dhollis
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Noa Resare
Re: RPM filesystem?
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: The USB keys bug
From
: Konstantin Ryabitsev
Re: The USB keys bug
From
: John (J5) Palmieri
Re: The USB keys bug
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: The USB keys bug
From
: Konstantin Ryabitsev
The USB keys bug
From
: Jean Francois Martinez
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Remco Treffkorn
Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- sed -e g/lsb/fhs/i
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE
From
: Richard Emberson
Re: RPM filesystem?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: Tim Waugh
Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
RE: RPM filesystem?
From
: Erik LaBianca
Dear Fedora Community, what do you want?
From
: Scott Sloan
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: net-tools-1.60-25.1
From
: Phil Knirsch
Re: kernel-module rpms under FC2
From
: Dave Jones
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: ethereal-0.10.3-2.1
From
: Phil Knirsch
[SECURITY] Fedora Core 1 Update: ethereal-0.10.3-0.1.1
From
: Phil Knirsch
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Peter Maas
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Bill Nottingham
rawhide report: 20040603 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Florian La Roche
Fedora Core 2 Update: cups-1.1.20-11.1
From
: Tim Waugh
Re: RPM filesystem?
From
: Jos Vos
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Linux: x86 No Execute Support
From
: Arjan van de Ven
RPM filesystem?
From
: Tim Daly
Re: Linux: x86 No Execute Support
From
: Alan Cox
Linux: x86 No Execute Support
From
: Neal D. Becker
kernel-module rpms under FC2
From
: Aaron Bennett
Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent
From
: Rik van Riel
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- "standards"
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- "standards"
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Matthew T. O'Connor
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Chris Chabot
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Chris Chabot
Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.
From
: Phil Knirsch
Re: systematic Kerberization
From
: Pau Aliagas
Re: systematic Kerberization
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Dax Kelson
Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Chris Chabot
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Dax Kelson
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip
From
: Alan Cox
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Alan Cox
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Join GPG web of trust?
From
: Chris McDonough
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems, " "older ISAs"
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: P
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Alan Cox
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite," "Core" capable systems
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword
From
: Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- more "mainstream" or "popular"?
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Re: eMachines M680x kernel (Was: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm)
From
: Stephen Smoogen
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
rawhide report: 20040602 changes
From
: Build System
[OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: systematic Kerberization
From
: Pau Aliagas
Re: Join GPG web of trust?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: Join GPG web of trust?
From
: Panu Matilainen
eMachines M680x kernel (Was: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm)
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- more "mainstream" or "popular"?
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm
From
: Chris Chabot
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems, " "older ISAs"
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- AMD5x86 = 486 ISA
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems," "older ISAs"
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm
From
: Chris Kloiber
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Matthew Miller
P2 CPU "class," but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Strange dial-up Internet question
From
: Steven P. Ulrick
Join GPG web of trust?
From
: Chris McDonough
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: David T Hollis
Strange dial-up Internet question
From
: Steven P. Ulrick
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Dax Kelson
Re: Using a non-default file system in the "minimal installation"
From
: Noa Resare
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Matthew Miller
Using a non-default file system in the "minimal installation"
From
: Martin Olsson
Re: building packages for FC2 for external kernel modules
From
: Thomas Vander Stichele
Re: Why is hotplug disabled when loading network modules
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: James Harrison
Re: Need grub interface -- define specifics
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Need grub interface -- define specifics
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Need grub interface
From
: Neal D. Becker
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
Re: problem with Linux 2.6.6-1.403 and scsi
From
: Gregory Woodbury
problem with Linux 2.6.6-1.403 and scsi
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
requesting more bugzilla permissions
From
: Marius Andreiana
Why is hotplug disabled when loading network modules
From
: Jean-Rene Cormier
rawhide report: 20040601 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Self-Introduction: Alex Perez
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Missing ethereal after installation of FC2
From
: Nils O.
Re: Self-Introduction: Alex Perez
From
: John Major
Re: Self-Introduction: Alex Perez
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Not sure where to post this message
From
: Joseph Hurst
Re: Not sure where to post this message
From
: Alan Cox
Not sure where to post this message
From
: Joseph Hurst/BILBO13
Re: submount?
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: submount?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: submount?
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: submount?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: submount?
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: submount?
From
: Alan Cox
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla problem
From
: Z
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Ismael Juma
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: K. Spearel
Re: Reduce "Core" to 1 Binary CD? -- WAS: Request for Packages in Fedora Core 3
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Reduce "Core" to 1 Binary CD? -- WAS: Request for Packages in Fedora Core 3
From
: Willem Riede
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Balint Cristian
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Jakub Jelinek
rawhide report: 20040531 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Howto use the "pxeboot" directory?
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: Intel® 536ep V.92 modem (PCI) chipset driver & 2.6 kernel under FC2
From
: Cosmin Hanulescu
Howto use the "pxeboot" directory?
From
: Mac
Re: submount?
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: VPN solution(s) for Fedora Core
From
: H. Peter Anvin
Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule]
From
: Warren Togami
Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?
From
: dragoran
Self-Introduction: Alex Perez
From
: Alex Perez
Re: Making Fedora Core CD #1 Standalone -- the "common denominator"
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: Reduce "Core" to 1 Binary CD? -- WAS: Request for Packages in Fedora Core 3
From
: Bryan J. Smith
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla problem
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: Missing ethereal after installation of FC2
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Missing ethereal after installation of FC2
From
: Casper Pedersen
QA Application XML save formats.
From
: Toshio
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla problem
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla problem
From
: Alexandre Oliva
rawhide report: 20040530 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Intel® 536ep V.92 modem (PCI) chipset driver & 2.6 kernel under FC2
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Unofficial Fedora FAQ Updated for Fedora Core 2
From
: Max K-A
Intel® 536ep V.92 modem (PCI) chipset driver & 2.6 kernel under FC2
From
: Cosmin Hanulescu
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla problem
From
: Z
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Mike Hearn
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Tony Grant
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Christian Paratschek
rawhide report: 20040529 changes
From
: Build System
Re: udev in initrd
From
: Greg KH
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Samuel Flory
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Alan Cox
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Peter Maas
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: 3ware 9500
From
: Rex Dieter
3ware 9500
From
: Peter Maas
selinux disabled in new kernel
From
: Gary Peck
Re: kernel-smp missing in updates/testing?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: kernel-smp missing in updates/testing?
From
: Bill Nottingham
kernel-smp missing in updates/testing?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Fedora Core 1 Update: vsftpd-1.2.1-4.fc1
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Bill Nottingham
udev in initrd
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Paul Heinlein
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Panu Matilainen
rawhide report: 20040528 changes
From
: Build System
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: seth vidal
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Fedora Core 1 Update: gimp-1.2.5-2
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: rpm groups and fedora: a modest proposal
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: OT: Livna.org rsync access down?
From
: Arnaud Abelard
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: OT: Livna.org rsync access down?
From
: Andrew Farris
Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks
From
: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Fedora Core 2 Update: php-4.3.6-5
From
: Joe Orton
Fedora Core 2 Update: subversion-1.0.4-1
From
: Joe Orton
OT: Livna.org rsync access down?
From
: Aaron Bennett
XP Dual Boot Problems - contribution from a newbie
From
: Thiers Botelho
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Christian Paratschek
Re: Confusion with new platforms and packages
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Call for Discussion: Summary document concerning Prevention and Recovery of XP Dual Boot Problems
From
: Gene C.
Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Peter Backlund
small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing
From
: Christian Paratschek
rawhide report: 20040527 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Confusion with new platforms and packages
From
: Paul Nasrat
Re: Confusion with new platforms and packages
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Reduce "Core" to 1 Binary CD? -- WAS: Request for Packages in Fedora Core 3
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: Reduce "Core" to 1 Binary CD? -- WAS: Request for Packages in Fedora Core 3
From
: Willem Riede
Re: xdaliclock rpm for fedora core 2 ?
From
: Carwyn Edwards
xdaliclock rpm for fedora core 2 ?
From
: Gabriel L. Somlo
Re: debugging xorg-x11
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Re: debugging xorg-x11
From
: Felipe Alfaro Solana
Re: rpmbuild-nonroot %{version} interpreted incorrectly
From
: Leonard den Ottolander
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
