Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 17:25:44 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

> That leaves autoconf, automake, byacc/bison and libtool (maybe). What
> about the idea to make these (plus the packages you mentioned) an
> explicit requirement for rpm-build?

rpm-build's purpose is not in defining a build environment. Hence I doubt,
the package will be extended with dependencies. On the contrary, with its
dependencies, fedora-rpmdevtools serves as a meta package.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux