On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 13:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michael Schwendt (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Better let's discuss whether above set should be extended. E.g. with > > 'gettext' and 'desktop-file-utils', as they are needed by many src.rpms. > > Yes and maybe, if you're trolling for opinions. > > Bill As stands now gcc-g++ needs to be specified in BuildRequires if you're using mach as there is nothing else in "C++ build" toolchain that requires it. If you leave it out, mach (correctly) removes the gcc-c++ package before attempting to build it. Some of the others are superfluous, but that one is not. -- Shahms King <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx>
