Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:59:31 -0700, Shahms King wrote:

> As stands now gcc-g++ needs to be specified in BuildRequires if you're
> using mach as there is nothing else in "C++ build" toolchain that
> requires it.

Then add it to mach's list of 'build' packages.

Do any C++ based packages in Fedora Core buildrequire gcc-c++?
I don't think so. So you can't rebuild those packages in mach unless
you fix mach's 'build' definition.

>  If you leave it out, mach (correctly) removes the gcc-c++
> package before attempting to build it. 

It does not install the package at first.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux