On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Shahms King wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 13:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Michael Schwendt (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Better let's discuss whether above set should be extended. E.g. with > > > 'gettext' and 'desktop-file-utils', as they are needed by many src.rpms. > > > > Yes and maybe, if you're trolling for opinions. > > > > Bill > > As stands now gcc-g++ needs to be specified in BuildRequires if you're > using mach as there is nothing else in "C++ build" toolchain that > requires it. An oversight that should be fixed. gcc-c++ should certainly be in the "default developer toolchain" or add Requires: gcc-c++ to any/all C++ developer libraries (e.g. qt-devel, kdelibs-devel, mozilla-devel) -- Rex
