Multiple LUN support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Multiple LUN support?
From: Hugh Caley <Hugh_Caley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:54:22 -0700
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040519)

Is Fedora still distributed without multiple LUN support by default? If so, I wonder what the advantage is to that?

Hugh

--
Hugh Caley | Unix Systems Administrator | CIS
AFFYMETRIX, INC. | 6550 Vallejo St. Ste 100 | Emeryville, CA 94608
Tel: 510-428-8537 | Hugh_Caley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiple LUN support?
  - From: Rui Miguel Seabra
- Re: Multiple LUN support?
  - From: Chris Kloiber

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
Next by Date: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
Previous by thread: v4l2 driver parameters
Next by thread: Re: Multiple LUN support?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux