Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 18:53, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > If all our customers in RHEL space start saying "but why not use /srv" during
> > RHEL4 testing then maybe there is a case for change, otherwise its violating
> > the first principle of engineering "If it aint broke..."
yes!

> Right. I would hope that people who want to see the move happening to the /srv
> layout also take some minutes and lobby for doing these changes. Until now
> a see a huge majority who fears the change and does not believe in more
> longterm benefits from this?
yes. I don't see any benefits, only confusion:
- exactly what services go in /srv? everything which is in /var now?
- add another unclear partition (/srv) to decision making on
partitioning
- there are a lot of books/howtos which reference /var. Many people are
migrating to linux now. They read those, find it's different in reality,
confusing.

-- 
Marius Andreiana
Galuna - Solutii Linux in Romania
http://www.galuna.ro



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux