> a) 2.6.6-1.391 with preempt on: > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~nando/latencytest/20040601/2.6.6-1.391.1.ll.rhfc2.ccrma/ 85.8% is in the 1ms range > > b) 2.6.6-1.391 with preempt off: > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~nando/latencytest/20040601/2.6.6-1.391.2.ll.rhfc2.ccrma/ 87.9% is in the 1ms range so somewhat better > > c) 2.6.6-1.391 with preempt off and bad radeon latency patch (see > comments below): > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~nando/latencytest/20040601/2.6.6-1.391.3.ll.rhfc2.ccrma/ > ohhh interesting I will be looking at the patch and see if I can fix it up.. the results look spiffy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
