Re: Self-Introduction: Alex Perez

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lun, 31/05/2004 Ã 23:55 -0400, John Major a Ãcrit :
> Hi,
> 
> 	I definitely agree with Per here, as it sounds like it would best be
> suited for Fedora extras.  FC2 already comes with two of the most
> popular desktop environments out and I think it is unlikely that any
> more will be included in FC3.  Many people, as your probably know,
> already feel that the download for FC2 is quite large and is somewhat
> unnecessary as many people do not want all the packages.  I personally
> like the selection as I don't mind the download times however that does
> not seem to be the most popular feeling on this issue.  I agree that it
> is more likely that it would be included in Fedora extras.

Well, seeing how xfce made a stealth entry in FC2, lots of things can
happent once there are quality packages in Fedora Extras.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux