Yea, on 2 of the mail servers i maintain their using about 35 Mb virtual mem, and 25Mb resident mem.. Which indeed is more then the 2.63 version used However i think this is more of an upstream issue (ie spamassassin developers) issue then a fedora packaging / shipping issue; Try posting a mail on their devel lists? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars E. Pettersson" <lars@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 21:07 Subject: Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule] > On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 09:24, Warren Togami wrote: > > upstream Bugzilla. I personally have been using 3.0.0 svn snapshots on > > my personal server for a few weeks now, and it has been much better than > > spamassassin-2.63 for me. > > I am using spamassassin-3.0-0.0.svn20040530 from rawhide in a fully > updated FC2. I used the src.rpm package in rawhide and made rpms with > rpmbuild. > > I have spamd running, no changes made to any file in the spamassassin > rpm. Spamd is called by spamc from procmail with no switches. > > Everything seem to work except one thing, spamd eats up a lot of memory, > much more than the 2.63 version I used before (saw the same thing in > spamassassin-3.0-0.0.svn20040524) > > []# free > total used free shared buffers > cached > Mem: 517164 492016 25148 0 57456 > 96476 > -/+ buffers/cache: 338084 179080 > Swap: 704292 39200 665092 > []# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin stop > Shutting down spamd: [ OK ] > []# free > total used free shared buffers > cached > Mem: 517164 239772 277392 0 57492 > 96504 > -/+ buffers/cache: 85776 431388 > Swap: 704292 39200 665092 > []# > > Am I the only one seeing this? > > /Lars > -- > Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxxx> > http://www.sm6rpz.se/ > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >
