Le ven, 04/06/2004 Ã 09:45 -0400, Tom Diehl a Ãcrit : > On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Phil Knirsch wrote: > > > That was one of the main reasons for not putting now too much into /srv > > at first. A slow migration will allow things to get sorted out and see > > if people like the idea in general. > > > > This is not a revolution, it's an evolution where the LSB and the FHS > > try to put a little more sense and structure into a filesystem > > hierarchy that has grown over the last 20-30 years and which is bound > > to have some archaic and arguably wrong places where to put stuff. > > > > And believe me, you don't want to sit in my/our chair if we move httpd > > from /var/www and it breaks only for 1% of our customers. :-) > > You mean like when you mv'd it from /home/www to /var/www? I seem to remember > going through this a few years ago. :-( And the problem with this was always it fixed apache without fixing all the other users, since new toplevel dirs in /var are actually discouraged. At least with /srv/, you don't limit the coverage to one app, or even all the currently existing apps. /var/www always felt too apache-centric, but I guess everyone was so hapy to dump /home/httpd no one cared at the time. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
