Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Per Bjornsson wrote:

On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 12:13, Per Bjornsson wrote:
<lots of rather aggressive-sounding stuff>

Oops. On seeing my previous e-mail I realize that it sounded pretty
angry. I didn't mean that to come out that harsh, my apologies. Please
read David Kewley's much more balanced post in the thread which was
apparently sent a bit earlier and essentially makes the main point I
wanted to make in a more rational and cool-headed way.



Per,

No offense taken. Aggressiveness is good and you made me think more clearly. I was hoping my post would provoke strong reactions -- and you are right, it is a straw man argument. Intentionally.

- Aaron


-- Aaron Bennett UNIX Administrator Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux