Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: razvan.vilt@xxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:29:08 -0400
Cc:
In-reply-to: <1086542093.13985.12.camel@d3vi1.linux360.ro>
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1086138372.29240.171.camel@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com> <20040602161430.GB14837@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <40C2875B.50206@bellsouth.net> <20040606160005.GD8186@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <001901c44be3$b3251db0$0200a8c0@gandalf> <1086542093.13985.12.camel@d3vi1.linux360.ro>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 08:14:53PM +0300, Razvan Corneliu C.R. d3vi1 VILT wrote:
> should not kill anything... Just move them in a separate repository,
> like.... say... Fedora Extras.

Anyone who wants to can. Packages are not in fedora extras because either
1. Patent issues
2. They are in core
3. Nobody has decided its worth doing..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Chris Chabot
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Razvan Corneliu C.R. "d3vi1" VILT

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Previous by thread: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Next by thread: P2 CPU "class," but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]