On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 21:34, Steven Pritchard wrote: > I've mentioned here before that I've written a script to build > "correct" (in other words, "will pass QA") spec files for perl > modules. Thanks to José Pedro Oliveira, the output of the script is > now *very* close to the "official" fedora.us spec template. > > The script seems useful enough that I'd really like some more feedback > on it. It can be found here: > > http://www.silug.org/~steve/software/scripts/perl/cpanspec > > Besides trying to be correct, the script *tries* to automatically > determine BuildRequires, BuildArch, package description, and which > files are documentation. The generated spec files *will* have to be > edited, but hopefully only slightly. I will have to test this against some of the corner cases I know of. There are some packages that do not demand certain modules be installed, but really need them anyways. (At least one of the RPM packages have dependencies on a couple of things that are needed to make them useful, yet they are not hard dependencies in the code.) -- Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
