Once upon a time, Phil Knirsch <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > I came up with a small list of packages that, due to the change in the > latest FHS-2.3 and the addition of /srv and /media would seem likely > candidates for partiall data migration to /srv: I think this new top-level directory is doomed to failure. For one thing, for a well set-up server, you'll need /srv to be on a separate partition from /. Since you already need separate partitions for /usr, /var, /home, /tmp, and (in some places) /usr/local, you really don't want a new top-level directory. The first thing I'd probably do is make /srv a symlink to /var/srv, /usr/local/srv, or some such. Face it, user-modifiable files belong in /usr/local. We don't need a new top-level directory (that is different from every Unix-like system in existence) to hold local files. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
