Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
From: Leonard den Ottolander <leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 02:31:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <604aa791040606101972ed633e@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1086138372.29240.171.camel@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com> <20040602161430.GB14837@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <40C2875B.50206@bellsouth.net> <20040606160005.GD8186@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <001901c44be3$b3251db0$0200a8c0@gandalf> <d49fe110406061009422deeff@mail.gmail.com> <604aa791040606101972ed633e@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Jeff,

> dropping tcl in Core and moving it into Extras makes a lot of sense.

Python BuildPrereqs tcl-devel. That makes tcl rather core I would say :)
. 

Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Chris Chabot
- Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Jeff Spaleta

Prev by Date: irda problems [FC2]
Next by Date: Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Next by thread: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]