Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: nodata
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Mark
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Fedora 10 Beta Freeze - new packages into rawhide ?
From
: David Timms
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Pavel Shevchuk
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Mark
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: forum
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Johan Cwiklinski
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Denis Leroy
rawhide report: 20080907 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Pavel Shevchuk
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: drago01
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: drago01
Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Davide Moretti
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Packaging Cherokee
From
: Debarshi Ray
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: David Nielsen
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Help gpsim F-9 builds on x86_64 and i386 but fails on ppc
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Help gpsim F-9 builds on x86_64 and i386 but fails on ppc
From
: Roy Rankin
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Roy Rankin
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Alain PORTAL
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Lyos Gemini Norezel
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Todd Zullinger
Why I'll leave fedora (french speaking people only) [1]
From
: Alain PORTAL
Re: Setting up a SIG
From
: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Mark
Setting up a SIG
From
: Paul
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Note to package maintainers: unowned directories
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: David Nielsen
Re: Commands for koji - targetting distros
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Tom London
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Commands for koji - targetting distros
From
: Paul
Re: Unable to access cvs
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Unable to access cvs
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Remi Collet
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Paul
Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: sean darcy
Re: Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Unable to access cvs
From
: David Nielsen
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Erik van Pienbroek
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: David Nielsen
Re: F9 chkfontpath replacement?
From
: Hans Ulrich Niedermann
Unable to access cvs
From
: Alain PORTAL
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Alain PORTAL
Note to package maintainers: unowned directories
From
: Michael Schwendt
rawhide report: 20080906 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Boot speedup with readahead
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: GNU Common Lisp (gcl) - need a new security context?
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Xavier Lamien
Heads up: packages with Patch:/%patch0 or Patch0:/%patch issues in Rawhide
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: subhodip biswas
Re: GNU Common Lisp (gcl) - need a new security context?
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Till Maas
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: broken dependencies on libfd and libopcodes
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: SGML support refactored in F-10?
From
: Orion Poplawski
broken dependencies on libfd and libopcodes
From
: Dave Nomura
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Martin Ebourne
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Matt Domsch
GNU Common Lisp (gcl) - need a new security context?
From
: David A. Wheeler
Re: yum update problem from fresh F9-i386
From
: M A Young
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: David Nielsen
F9 chkfontpath replacement?
From
: Jos Vos
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Deepak Bhole
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Paul
Re: Heads-up: libdap and libnc-dap updates
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Deepak Bhole
Re: koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: subhodip biswas
Re: koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
koji build failed due to python makefile
From
: subhodip biswas
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: subhodip biswas
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Gérard Milmeister
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Gérard Milmeister
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: yum update problem from fresh F9-i386
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Fedora 8 and 9 updates status
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: yum update problem from fresh F9-i386
From
: Seth Vidal
yum update problem from fresh F9-i386
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Howard Wilkinson
Re: rawhide report: 20080905 changes
From
: orion
Re: Heads-up: libdap and libnc-dap updates
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: rawhide report: 20080905 changes
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Heads-up: libdap and libnc-dap updates
From
: orion
Re: Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: rawhide report: 20080905 changes
From
: orion
Heads-up: libdap and libnc-dap updates
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Paul W. Frields
Re: help needed for a failed build, libnc-dap C++
From
: Patrice Dumas
Kernel-headers from Fedora 8 updates missing ext3_fs.h
From
: Howard Wilkinson
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Patrice Dumas
A browseable networktree for access to SMB, FTP, SSH and other resources.
From
: Stef Bon
rawhide report: 20080905 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: OT: This is for java geeks out there
From
: Christoph Höger
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Farkas Levente
MinGW on Fedora - an update
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: OT: This is for java geeks out there
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: Anaconda install - conflicts over ifcfg-eth0
From
: David Cantrell
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Anaconda install - conflicts over ifcfg-eth0
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Noriko Mizumoto
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Noriko Mizumoto
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: John Poelstra
Outage Notification - 2008-09-05 01:00 UTC
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: rawhide breakage
From
: Dennis J.
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Noriko Mizumoto
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Luke Macken
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Noriko Mizumoto
FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-03
From
: Brian Pepple
rawhide breakage
From
: Dennis J.
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Conrad Meyer
OT: This is for java geeks out there
From
: Christoph Höger
Re: Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Adrian Pilchowiec
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Using rpm for incremental development builds? (was: Dependency loops considered harmful?)
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
A couple of license-relate questions
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Jos Vos
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Martin Stransky
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: help needed for a failed build, libnc-dap C++
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Rawhide install traceback
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Rawhide install traceback
From
: Chris Lumens
Re: Rawhide install traceback
From
: David Cantrell
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Rawhide install traceback
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Ville Skyttä
help needed for a failed build, libnc-dap C++
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: Fedora release time?
From
: Seth Vidal
Fedora release time?
From
: Paul W. Frields
Re: Can't tag package for EL-5
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Some initial discussions of a Fedora HPC SIG
From
: Orion Poplawski
Can't tag package for EL-5
From
: Neal Becker
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Bill Nottingham
query regarding placing a bug
From
: subhodip biswas
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
rawhide report: 20080904 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Thomas Moschny
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: F10 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Fedora fonts SIG pre-freeze status
From
: Lyos Norezel
Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Re: Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Chris Snook
F10 Schedule
From
: Noriko Mizumoto
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: sean darcy
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Chris Snook
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: Horrible memory leak in rawhide (kernel leak?)
From
: Tom London
Re: Horrible memory leak in rawhide (kernel leak?)
From
: Kyle McMartin
Re: Horrible memory leak in rawhide (kernel leak?)
From
: Erik van Pienbroek
Re: Horrible memory leak in rawhide (kernel leak?)
From
: Jon Masters
Horrible memory leak in rawhide (kernel leak?)
From
: Erik van Pienbroek
Re: Some initial discussions of a Fedora HPC SIG
From
: Doug Ledford
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: James Antill
Re: Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Luke Macken
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Chris Snook
Re: xmms heads up
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Pavel Shevchuk
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Yaakov Nemoy
Microsoft patent affect Fedora?
From
: Mike Cronenworth
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Jon Ciesla
Dependency loops considered harmful?
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: SGML support refactored in F-10?
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Till Maas
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Till Maas
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Till Maas
ext4 testing in the F10 release cycle
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Till Maas
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Using lzma compressed tarball as Source0
From
: Till Maas
Re: xmms heads up
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: telive 2008 released (in time for f10?)
From
: Ulrich Drepper
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Linus Walleij
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Linus Walleij
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Linus Walleij
rawhide report: 20080903 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: xmms heads up
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: telive 2008 released (in time for f10?)
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: M A Young
Re: Fedora fonts SIG pre-freeze status
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Help Needed: Test pidgin-2.5.1 and Yahoo IM
From
: Nicu Buculei
Fedora fonts SIG pre-freeze status
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: M A Young
Re: Help Needed: Test pidgin-2.5.1 and Yahoo IM
From
: Manuel Wolfshant
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28 x86_64
From
: Paul
Re: libmozembed
From
: Martin Stransky
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Richard Hughes
Help Needed: Test pidgin-2.5.1 and Yahoo IM
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28 x86_64
From
: Alex Lancaster
Re: Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Re: Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Todd Zullinger
RE: Fedora 10 Beta Freeze coming soon
From
: Jerry Williams
Fedora Security Tools spin
From
: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Re: Fedora 10 Beta Freeze coming soon
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Andrew Overholt
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: M A Young
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
xmms heads up
From
: Paul
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Fedora 10 Beta Freeze coming soon
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Fedora 10 Beta Freeze coming soon
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Help Needed: Figure out F9 Updates PackageKit deps
From
: Warren Togami
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Schedule for F9 updates?
From
: Stefan Grosse
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Joe Nall
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Jerry James
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Jon Masters
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: darrell pfeifer
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20080903) FESCO meeting
From
: Bryan Kearney
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Jerry James
Plan for tomorrows (20080903) FESCO meeting
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Xavier Toth
Xfce SIG meeting today!
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Callum Lerwick
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Michel Salim
telive 2008 released (in time for f10?)
From
: Neal Becker
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Dan Williams
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Mat Booth
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Laurent Rineau
Heads up: varnish goes from 1.1.2 to 2.0-beta1
From
: Ingvar Hagelund
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Dan Williams
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Dan Williams
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Frank Ch. Eigler
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Xavier Toth
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Looking for new package owners
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
Re: dbus error from yum
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Bruno Wolff III
dbus error from yum
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Revert curl change made for flash
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Bill Crawford
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Thomas M Steenholdt
wtf ... Something strips installed binaries???
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: SGML support refactored in F-10?
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Revert curl change made for flash
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Revert curl change made for flash
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Revert curl change made for flash
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: Revert curl change made for flash
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Fedora 9.1?
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Fedora 9.1?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Fedora 9.1?
From
: nodata
Re: file system mount
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: Fedora 9.1?
From
: Jon Stanley
Fedora 9.1?
From
: Naheem Zaffar
rawhide?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Problems with kernel-2.6.26 and 2.6.27-0.x.rc2
From
: Joshua C.
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: libdvdread slight API breakage
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Tim Lauridsen
Re: Thunderbird 3.0
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Jindrich Novy
Thunderbird 3.0
From
: forum
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: Couple of review requests - haxe and nekovm - swapsies anyone?
From
: Dan Horák
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Patrice Dumas
Couple of review requests - haxe and nekovm - swapsies anyone?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: wirteable config files path
From
: Johan Cwiklinski
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Xavier Toth
Re: [PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Problems with kernel-2.6.26 and 2.6.27-0.x.rc2
From
: Clyde E. Kunkel
[PATCH] yum: make transaction results available to plugins
From
: Xavier Toth
nspluginwrapper and nppdf.so (Adobe Acrobat)
From
: Jos Vos
Re: using yum/repoquery to provide dependency trees
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: using yum/repoquery to provide dependency trees
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: system autodeath
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Dan Holwerda
Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?
From
: Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?
From
: Bill Crawford
Re: wirteable config files path
From
: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
From
: Balbir Singh
Re: Problems with kernel-2.6.26 and 2.6.27-0.x.rc2
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: using yum/repoquery to provide dependency trees
From
: James Antill
Re: Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Vasile Gaburici
using yum/repoquery to provide dependency trees
From
: Peter Robinson
Very nice of you to write the tl2rpm converter
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Problems with kernel-2.6.26 and 2.6.27-0.x.rc2
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Building from svn broken due to missing gnome-doc-utils.make
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: help required regarding coredumper package
From
: Rakesh Pandit
(X)Emacs YAML mode?
From
: Vasile Gaburici
libmozembed
From
: Paul
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Steve Grubb
wirteable config files path
From
: Johan Cwiklinski
Re: libdvdread slight API breakage
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: RFC: FEver and RPath checks in Koji
From
: Michel Salim
Re: License Change: python-GeoIP is now LGPL
From
: Michel Salim
Re: License Change: python-GeoIP is now LGPL
From
: Matt Domsch
License Change: python-GeoIP is now LGPL
From
: Michael Fleming
Expected Plymouth behavior?
From
: Dennis J.
Re: NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Linus Walleij
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Johan Cwiklinski
Re: bodhi internal error
From
: Thomas Moschny
Re: mock errors
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: mock errors
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Till Maas
Re: mock errors
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Koji & SE Linux policy
From
: Steve Grubb
Koji & SE Linux policy
From
: Steve Grubb
NetworkManager-pptp
From
: Mat Booth
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Steve Grubb
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Steve Grubb
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Steve Grubb
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Robert Scheck
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: pulseaudio is silent after waking up from suspend
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Josh Boyer
pulseaudio is silent after waking up from suspend
From
: Ahmed Kamal
rawhide report: 20080830 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: drago01
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Andreas Ericsson
help required regarding coredumper package
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: Problems with kernel-2.6.26 and 2.6.27-0.x.rc2
From
: Joshua C.
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Alsa problem
From
: Michel Salim
Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Alsa problem
From
: Paul
Re: Interesting koji problem
From
: Jesse Keating
Interesting koji problem
From
: Paul
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Tim Jackson
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Peter Lemenkov
rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Mike Chambers
rawhide report: 20080829 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Some initial discussions of a Fedora HPC SIG
From
: Shawn Starr
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Interested in Fedora on Smaller Machines?
From
: nodata
Re: Interested in Fedora on Smaller Machines?
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Interested in Fedora on Smaller Machines?
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: [Fedora Forum] Micro Fedora
From
: W. Michael Petullo
Re: Interested in Fedora on Smaller Machines?
From
: nodata
Re: Looking for new package owners
From
: Ondřej Vašík
Re: Interested in Fedora on Smaller Machines?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Looking for new package owners
From
: Quentin Spencer
Re: ifup-local $DEVNAME versus ifup-pre-local $CONFIGFILE
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: AWOL maintainer of obsolete package
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Looking for new package owners
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: [Fedora Forum] Micro Fedora
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: [Fedora Forum] Micro Fedora
From
: Vasile Gaburici
Re: [Fedora Forum] Micro Fedora
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: SGML support refactored in F-10?
From
: Ondřej Vašík
Re: [Fedora Forum] Micro Fedora
From
: Patrice Kadionik
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-08-28
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: [PATCH] varnish spec
From
: Ingvar Hagelund
Re: ext4dev oddity
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: ext4dev oddity
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
