On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 15:54 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > And that isn't really different from what currently happens with pure noarch > packages, which are just built on a random arch and it's the packager's > responsibility to make sure they're really arch-independent. To be fair though, making a subpackage noarch is slightly different. One could easily fall into the trap of assuming that the entire build set will be produced on the one arch, just like an rpmbuild on a local machine would do, and that the noarch subpackage would match the arch specific other subpackages. It is something to watch out for. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
