Jindrich Novy <jnovy <at> redhat.com> writes:
> This could be the easiest way to go. Packager would then be responsible for
> differences if the content of noarch subpackage is dependent on
> builder arch and affects somehow binary package functionality or e.g.
> generated documentation.
And that isn't really different from what currently happens with pure noarch
packages, which are just built on a random arch and it's the packager's
responsibility to make sure they're really arch-independent.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
